Recently I happened upon Big Questions Online, a blog about exactly what it’s name suggests. There are a few features that mark the blog out as unique. One is it’s sponsor (the Templeton Foundation). Another is the practice they follow of open but moderated conversation about each post. (Think American Dialectic, but less formal.) It’s a good format for argumentation theorists who are interested in studying online exchanges. The posts are interesting and well-written enough to make them good discussion starters for classes too.
Archive for the ‘Connections’ Category
New Blog of Interest: Big Questions Online
Posted in Connections, Discussion, tagged big questions online, John Templeton Foundation, online argumentation on August 24, 2012| Leave a Comment »
Symposium Announcement: The Evolution of Argumentation
Posted in Announcements, Argumentation, Connections, Symposium, tagged argument theory of reasoning, Burkhard Schafer, CRRAR, Hugo Mercier, Ian Hacking, Lori Buchanan, Mark Aakhus, Mercier-Sperber on August 17, 2012| Leave a Comment »
The Evolution of Argumentation: The Sperber-Mercier Theory
5-6 October 2012
University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada
Keynote Speaker: HUGO MERCIER, University of Neuchâtel
Panelists:
- Dr. Mark Aakhus, Communications, Rutgers University
- Dr. Lori Buchanan, Psychology, University of Windsor
- Dr. Ian Hacking, Philosophy, University Professor Emeritus, University of Toronto; Permanent Chair in the History and Philosophy of Scientific Concepts, Collège de France.
- Dr. Burkhard Schafer, Computational Legal Theory, School of Law, University of Edinburgh
Chairs:
- Dr. Douglas Walton, CRRAR & Assumption Chair in Argumentation Studies, University of Windsor
- Dr. Steve Patterson, Philosophy, Marygrove College, Detroit.
Sponsored by:
THE CENTRE FOR RESEARCH IN REASONING, ARGUMENTATION, AND RHETORIC (CRRAR)
Announcement: Mellon/ACLS Dissertation Completion Fellowships
Posted in Announcements, Connections, Contests & Competitions, tagged Mellon/ACLS Dissertation Completion Fellowships, political philosophy, political theory on August 17, 2012| Leave a Comment »
From the Mellon/ALCS Fellowship homepage:
ACLS invites applications for the seventh annual competition for the Mellon/ACLS Dissertation Completion Fellowships, which support a year of research and writing to help advanced graduate students in the humanities and related social sciences in the last year of Ph.D. dissertation writing. The program encourages timely completion of the Ph.D. Applicants must be prepared to complete their dissertations within the period of their fellowship tenure and no later than August 31, 2014. A grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation supports this program.
The deadline is October 24 for fellowships lasting one year, from Summer 2013 to Summer 2014. Political philosophers and others who work in political theory are particularly encouraged to apply.
CFP: JURIX 2012
Posted in Argumentation, CFP, Computation, Connections, tagged artificial intelligence, dispute resolution, information systems for law, JURIX 2012, legal argumentation, legal reasoning on June 1, 2012| Leave a Comment »
Call for Papers: JURIX 2012
http://conference.jurix.nl/2012/cfp.html
The 25th International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 17-19th December 2012
Celebrating 25 years of supporting and enhancing cutting edge research in the interface between law and computer technology, the 2012 JURIX conference will return to its roots in Amsterdam. We invite submission of original papers on the advanced management of legal information and knowledge, covering foundations, methods, tools, systems and applications for the following (non-exhaustive) list of topics: (more…)
CFP: ExaCt 2012
Posted in CFP, Computation, Connections, tagged AI conferences, ECAI 2012, ExaCt 2012, explanation, explanation aware computing on May 17, 2012| Leave a Comment »
SECOND CALL FOR PAPERS
for the 7th International and ECAI 2012 Workshop on
EXPLANATION-AWARE COMPUTING (ExaCt 2012)
One-Day Workshop, 27 or 28 August 2012, Montpellier, France
http://exact2012.workshop.hm
** Submission deadline: May 28, 2012 **
When knowledge-based systems are partners in interactive socio-
technical processes, with incomplete and changing problem descriptions,
effective communication between human and software system is vital.
Explanations exchanged between human agents and software agents may
play a key role in such mixed-initiative problem solving. For
example, explanations may increase the confidence of the user in
specific results or in the system as a whole, by providing evidence of
how the results were derived. AI research has also focused on
how computer systems can themselves use explanations, for example to
guide learning. (more…)
Graduate course on Reasoning, one week intensive, Lund, Autumn 2012
Posted in Connections, Seminar/Workshop/Program Announcements, tagged cognitive psychology, Frank Zenker, graduate courses on reasoning, Lund University, philosophy on May 5, 2012| Leave a Comment »
Below are a few details about an intensive graduate course on reasoning to be held over one week at Lund University in Sweden. Credits earned will be transferable, and there is a possibility that help with accommodations may be made available.
LUND UNIVERSITY
Reasoning, 7,5 ECTS
Lecturer: Frank Zenker
Course dates: One week (Mo-Fr 10-12 and 14-16) in autumn 2012. Enter your date preferences now:
http://www.doodle.com/8r8b6vaxbaqnt7iq
If you would like to take this course please get in touch with the instructor now. E-mail & webpage
Course description
The study of reasoning—deductive, inductive, abductive, belief revision, defeasible, cross cultural, conversational, argumentative—is a major focus of investigation in both psychology and philosophy. Next to more traditional issues arising from the rationality debate, this includes a focus on fallacious reasoning and its reduction through education, the development of pragmatics, and the study of human reasoning process through neuro-imaging techniques.
Aim: The aim of this course is to enable learners to orient themselves in this research area (which may reasonably be called interdisciplinary) to the extent that they can actively participate in current empirical research and discourse on this matter.
We will work through select parts of a recently compiled selection of “classics” from a reader by Adler and Rips (2008). The three major themes are: 1. Foundations of Reasoning (Philosophical Viewpoints; Fallacies and Rationality), 2. Modes of Reasoning (Deductive Reasoning; Induction; Dual and Integrative Approaches; Abduction and Belief change; Causal and Counterfactual Reasoning; Argumentation); 3. Interactions of Reasoning in Human Thought (Reasoning and Pragmatics; domain-specific, Goal Based, and Evolutionary Approaches; Reasoning and Cultures; Biology, Emotions, and Reasoning).
Workload/Grading: Successful completion requires reading 20 to 30 pages per meeting, and the preparation and delivery of a max. 30 minute group presentation on one of the above subthemes (the presentation requires additional reading of ca. 60-90 pages). Learners are expected to focus on at least one of the above subthemes (see the table of content under the link below).
Grading occurs on the basis of presentation, an intermediate quiz, peer feedback, and a final paper (of 10-15 pages) due within 2 months after the end of the course.
Prerequisites: A background in mathematics or logic may be found helpful for some (but not all) subthemes. Learners with a background in the empirical sciences are especially welcome. A background in philosophy is not necessary to successfully conclude the course. Those interested in pursuing empirical work are assumed to have a background in empirical research methodology (which is not provided in this course). The course is open to students at Master’s level and up. The language of instruction is English.
Reference
Adler, J.E., and Rips, L.J. (2008). Reasoning. Studies of Human Inference and its Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (will be made available).
http://www.amazon.com/Reasoning-Studies-Human-Inference-Foundations/dp/0521848156
For more information contact Frank Zenker, Department of Philosophy & Cognitive Science, Kungshuset, Lundagård, 222 22 Lund, Sweden, Tel. 0046.70.148 31 35, http://www.fil.lu.se/persons/person.asp?filpers=792.
(Another) Fallacies Infographic
Posted in Connections, Critical Thinking, Discussion, Fallacies, Teaching, tagged infographics, logical fallacies, yourlogicalfallacyis.com on April 24, 2012| Leave a Comment »
My but these things are popular. This one comes to us via yourlogicalfallacyis.com and is free to download in three sizes. The graphic is also downloadable as vector art for those saavy and motivated enough to want to work with the image some more. In terms of design I think I like this one the best of all those shared on RAIL so far. (You can see the others here and here.) It also avoids the tricky business of classification and therefore might be more useful for teaching purposes. Below is a (crummy) screenshot. The files available for download are much higher quality.
It is interesting that the fallacies seem to be bubbling up as a meme in the culture at large like this. I wonder if it’s a sign of sorts that people have had enough of the shoddy, transparently shortsighted and self-interested discourse that has come to characterize so much of public life and are starting to crave discourse of a different kind–perhaps more rational, thoughtful, and careful. That would be nice…and timely too.
ArguBlogging
Posted in Argumentation, Computation, Connections, tagged AIF, ARG:Dundee, ArguBlogging, argument in blogging, Argumentation, blogging, blogosphere, Computation, internet culture on April 12, 2012| 1 Comment »
The ever-industrious folks at ARG:Dundee (the group behind the popular argument diagramming software Araucaria) have a lovely new tool for keeping track of and participating in argumentation on the “blogosphere”. They call it “argublogging“. I think it’s an impressive extension of the work they’ve done on the Argument Interchcange Format, or AIF. The video below gives a demonstration of how ArguBlogging works. If you use argument diagrams in class and discuss the kinds of current events that get discussed on blogs then this program may well be your new best friend. Have a look. Try it out. Send them feedback. This is work worth supporting.



