Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘CFP’ Category

CFP: COMMA 2014

Posted in Argumentation, CFP, Computation, tagged , , on February 21, 2014| Leave a Comment »

CALL FOR PAPERS, INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS, DEMONSTRATIONS

5th International Conference on

COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT (COMMA 2014)
Pitlochry, Scotland, September 9-12, 2014

comma2014.arg.dundee.ac.uk

AIMS AND SCOPE

Argumentation is an exciting research topic in artificial intelligence, with a broad spectrum of research activities ranging from theory to applications. The International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA) is a regular forum for presentation and exchange of the latest research results related to computational aspects of argumentation. After the successful editions in Liverpool (2006); Toulouse (2008); Desenzano del Garda (2010); and Vienna (2012); COMMA 2014 will be held in Scotland in September 2014.

TOPICS

Topics include, but are not limited to: (more…)

Read Full Post »

CFP: ELISIEM Workshop – Epistemic Logic for Individual, Social, and Interactive Epistemology

Posted in CFP, Connections, Logic, tagged , on January 28, 2014| Leave a Comment »

Via M-Phi

Epistemic Logic is a formal approach to modeling knowledge, belief, and other informational attitudes, developed by logicians, philosophers, computer scientists, AI researchers, economists, linguists, and others. Historically, with its origins in philosophy, epistemic logic promised to illuminate traditional issues of epistemology, the theory of knowledge. In recent years, epistemic logic has been making good on that promise, with important new applications not only to individual epistemology, a traditional focus of philosophers for the last two-and-a-half thousand years, but also in social epistemology, the more recent investigation of the social dimensions of knowledge and information flow, as well as interactive epistemology, the study of knowledge and belief in strategic, game-theoretic situations.

Click below for the full text of the CFP:

ELISIEM Workshop – Epistemic Logic for Individual, Social, and Interactive Epistemology.

Read Full Post »

CFP: GIRLS’14@LUND — Call for Abstracts

Posted in CFP, Computation, Connections, Logic, Rationality, tagged , , , , on January 28, 2014| Leave a Comment »

Via Loriweb:

The call for abstracts for the 3rd Conference on Games, Interaction, Reasoning, Learning & Semantics: Evolution and Cooperation held at Lund, Department of Philosophy and Cognitive Science on April 28-30, 2014, has submission deadline February 7th.

The 3rd Lund Conference on Games, Interaction, Reasoning, Learning and Semantics (GIRLS’14@LUND) welcomes submissions from researchers in philosophy, cognitive science, economics, and linguistics, using agent based models with bounded rationality, models of evolutionary dynamics, and other naturalistic approaches. The primary conference aims are to foster cooperation between these groups and help establish common ground.

Click on the link below for more information:

GIRLS’14@LUND — Call for Abstracts.

Read Full Post »

CfP: Tends in Logic XIV, Ghent

Posted in CFP, Computation, Connections, Logic, tagged , on January 27, 2014| Leave a Comment »

Read Full Post »

CFP: Arguing on the Web 2.0

Posted in Argumentation, CFP, Computation, Connections, tagged , on January 24, 2014| Leave a Comment »

International workshop
ARGUING ON THE WEB 2.0
Amsterdam, June 30 – July 1, 2014
Chairs: Fabio Paglieri & Chris Reed
Local organizer: Ulle Endriss

Deadline for submission: February 28, 2014
Submission format: short paper (max. 4000 words, references included)
Submission procedure: send your contribution, properly anonymized for peer reviewing, to fabio.paglieri@istc.cnr.it

A selection of accepted papers will be published in a special issue of Philosophy & Technology, in revised and extended form.

Full details: http://www.sintelnet.eu/content/arguing-web-20-0

Note: the workshop will take place right before the 8th ISSA conference (http://cf.hum.uva.nl/issa/ ), with no overlapping between the two events. For those interested in argumentation, attendance to both is highly recommended.

INVITED SPEAKERS (confirmed) (more…)

Read Full Post »

CFP: ArgMAS 2014

Posted in Argumentation, CFP, Computation, Logic, tagged , , on January 24, 2014| 1 Comment »

CALL FOR PAPERS

Eleventh International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems

ArgMAS 2014

www.mit.edu/~irahwan/argmas/argmas14/

Revised submission date! (See below.)

—————————————————————-

Submissions are invited for the Eleventh International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2014), to be held in Paris, France, as part of AAMAS 2014.

For ArgMAS 2014, papers are solicited on the concepts, theories, methodologies, and applications of computational models of argument in creating autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. Argumentation can be abstractly defined as the formal interaction of different arguments for and against some conclusion (e.g., a proposition, an action intention, a preference, etc). A single agent may use argumentation techniques to perform individual reasoning, to resolve conflicting
evidence, or to decide between conflicting goals.   Multiple agents may also use dialectical argumentation in order to identify and reconcile differences between themselves, through interactions such as negotiation, persuasion, and joint deliberation.

The main goal of ArgMAS 2014 will be to bring together the community of researchers working on argumentation in multi-agent systems. The workshop has the following technical goals: (more…)

Read Full Post »

CFP: Arguing on the Web 2.0

Posted in Argumentation, CFP, Computation, Connections, tagged , , , , on November 1, 2013| 1 Comment »

International workshop
ARGUING ON THE WEB 2.0
Amsterdam, June 30 – July 1, 2014
Chairs: Fabio Paglieri & Chris Reed
Local organizer: Ulle Endriss

RATIONALE

Argument and debate form cornerstones of civilized society and of intellectual life. As online interaction usurps many traditional forms of interaction and communication, we would hope to see these processes alive and well on the web. But we do not. In spite of the ever-growing volume of online interaction, its current mechanisms hamper and discourage serious debate; they facilitate poor quality argument; and they allow fuzzy thinking to go unchecked. Meanwhile, these same online resources are increasingly being trusted and adopted with little critical reflection. The problem needs to be addressed from two different but converging perspectives: (more…)

Read Full Post »

CFP: Trust, Argumentation and Technology

Posted in Argumentation, CFP, Computation, Connections, tagged , , , on October 31, 2013| Leave a Comment »

Call for papers
TRUST, ARGUMENTATION AND TECHNOLOGY
Special issue of Argument & Computation
Guest edited by Fabio Paglieri (ISTC-CNR Roma)
Deadline for submission: 15 December 2013

RATIONALE

Trust and argumentation have both been explored extensively, for their own sake as well as in the context of their relevance for technological transformations. More recently, these topics have started to be studied together, with an eye to their numerous and deep interactions. Trust and argumentation converge independently from technology (e.g., trust in speakers often affect our assessment of their arguments), but recent ICT developments have greatly magnified their interplay. (more…)

Read Full Post »

CFP: Virtues and Arguments

Posted in Argumentation, CFP, Communication, tagged , , , , , on October 18, 2013| 1 Comment »

CALL FOR PAPERS

Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy

VIRTUES AND ARGUMENTS
Deadline for submission: September 1, 2014

GUEST EDITORS
Andrew Aberdein (Florida Institute of Technology)
Daniel Cohen (Colby College)

OVERVIEW
Virtue-based approaches have made substantial contributions to ethics and epistemology. They have also found application in more unexpected fields, including the study of argument. Virtue Argumentation Theory mandates a shift in focus from acts and objects, or processes and products, to agents. Thus, Virtue Argumentation Theory brings a set of difficult but important new questions into focus, particularly about arguers’ conduct in inter-agent transactions. At the same time, Virtue Argumentation Theory also provides new signposts leading to their resolution. Several authors have recently begun to suggest answers to these questions. This special issue will consolidate and extend their work.

POSSIBLE TOPICS (more…)

Read Full Post »

CFP: ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF PHILOSOPHY & PSYCHIATRY

Posted in CFP, Connections, tagged , , , on October 1, 2013| 1 Comment »

CALL FOR ABSTRACTS

26th Anniversary Annual Meeting
May 3-4, 2014
New York City, NY

Theme: Clinical Reasoning

Conference Co-Chairs:
Ben Lewis, MD University of Utah School of Medicine
Brent Kious, MD PhD University of Utah School of Medicine
Claire Pouncey, MD PhD University of Pennsylvania
John Z Sadler, M.D. UT Southwestern Medical Center

Philosophers and clinicians have good reasons to reflect upon the processes of clinical reasoning. It is perhaps among the most important of the under-theorized and under-discussed elements of mental health practice. Despite being a psychological process that clinicians engage with every day, clinical reasoning remains poorly characterized both methodologically and pedagogically. Furthermore, it remains unclear how to combine the experiential aspects of clinical practice, with its traditional maxims and heuristics, with more evidence-based approaches. Models of psychiatric practice commonly overlook clinical reasoning processes and problems.

For this 26th annual meeting of AAPP, our theme focuses on the conceptual and philosophical aspects of clinical reasoning. (more…)

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »