Archive for the ‘Argumentation’ Category
10th eColloq on Argumentation
Posted in Argumentation, Computation, Informal Logic, tagged eColloq, online conferences in argumentation on January 24, 2014| Leave a Comment »
CFP: Arguing on the Web 2.0
Posted in Argumentation, CFP, Computation, Connections, tagged Arguing on the Web 2.0, ISSA 2014 on January 24, 2014| Leave a Comment »
International workshop
ARGUING ON THE WEB 2.0
Amsterdam, June 30 – July 1, 2014
Chairs: Fabio Paglieri & Chris Reed
Local organizer: Ulle Endriss
Deadline for submission: February 28, 2014
Submission format: short paper (max. 4000 words, references included)
Submission procedure: send your contribution, properly anonymized for peer reviewing, to fabio.paglieri@istc.cnr.it
A selection of accepted papers will be published in a special issue of Philosophy & Technology, in revised and extended form.
Full details: http://www.sintelnet.eu/content/arguing-web-20-0
Note: the workshop will take place right before the 8th ISSA conference (http://cf.hum.uva.nl/issa/ ), with no overlapping between the two events. For those interested in argumentation, attendance to both is highly recommended.
INVITED SPEAKERS (confirmed) (more…)
CFP: ArgMAS 2014
Posted in Argumentation, CFP, Computation, Logic, tagged ArgMAS 2014, computational theories of argumentation, default reasoning on January 24, 2014| 1 Comment »
CALL FOR PAPERS
Eleventh International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems
ArgMAS 2014
www.mit.edu/~irahwan/argmas/argmas14/
Revised submission date! (See below.)
—————————————————————-
Submissions are invited for the Eleventh International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2014), to be held in Paris, France, as part of AAMAS 2014.
For ArgMAS 2014, papers are solicited on the concepts, theories, methodologies, and applications of computational models of argument in creating autonomous agents and multi-agent systems. Argumentation can be abstractly defined as the formal interaction of different arguments for and against some conclusion (e.g., a proposition, an action intention, a preference, etc). A single agent may use argumentation techniques to perform individual reasoning, to resolve conflicting
evidence, or to decide between conflicting goals. Multiple agents may also use dialectical argumentation in order to identify and reconcile differences between themselves, through interactions such as negotiation, persuasion, and joint deliberation.
The main goal of ArgMAS 2014 will be to bring together the community of researchers working on argumentation in multi-agent systems. The workshop has the following technical goals: (more…)
Job Announcement: Professor in Language and Communication at UVA
Posted in Argumentation, Job Openings, tagged Argumentation jobs, University of Amsterdam on November 27, 2013| Leave a Comment »
Faculty of Humanities
The Faculty of Humanities provides education and conducts research with a strongly international profile in a large number of disciplines in the field of language, history, and culture. Located in the heart of Amsterdam, the Faculty maintains close ties with many cultural institutions in the capital city. Almost 1,000 employees are affiliated with the Faculty, which has about 8,000 students. The Faculty of Humanities consists of six departments.
The department of Dutch Studies has a vacancy for a professor in
Language and communication (in Dutch: Taalbeheersing)
1.0 fte (permanent position)
Profile (more…)
9th eColloq on Argumentation
Posted in Announcements, Argumentation, Connections, Discussion, tagged Constanza Ihnen, David Godden, eColloq, Frank Zenker, online conferences in argumentation on November 27, 2013| Leave a Comment »
CFP: 4th Iowa State University Summer Symposium on Science Communication
Posted in Argumentation, Communication, Connections, Symposium, tagged Iowa State Argumentation, Jean Goodwin on November 25, 2013| Leave a Comment »
Fourth Iowa State University Summer Symposium on Science Communication
Normative Aspects of Science Communication
30-31 May, 2014; Ames, IA
Submission deadline: January 15, 2014
This workshop at Iowa State University continues the discussion of science communication ethics opened in previous events. While the principles of effective communication of science has attracted widespread interest in recent years, attention to normative aspects of the interactions among scientists, professional communicators, and publics has lagged. We invite work from relevant disciplines including communication, rhetoric, philosophy, science and technology studies, and the sciences themselves, on topics such as: (more…)
CFP: Arguing on the Web 2.0
Posted in Argumentation, CFP, Computation, Connections, tagged arguing on the internet, argumentation and technology, Chris Reed, Fabio Paglieri, online argumentation on November 1, 2013| 1 Comment »
International workshop
ARGUING ON THE WEB 2.0
Amsterdam, June 30 – July 1, 2014
Chairs: Fabio Paglieri & Chris Reed
Local organizer: Ulle Endriss
RATIONALE
Argument and debate form cornerstones of civilized society and of intellectual life. As online interaction usurps many traditional forms of interaction and communication, we would hope to see these processes alive and well on the web. But we do not. In spite of the ever-growing volume of online interaction, its current mechanisms hamper and discourage serious debate; they facilitate poor quality argument; and they allow fuzzy thinking to go unchecked. Meanwhile, these same online resources are increasingly being trusted and adopted with little critical reflection. The problem needs to be addressed from two different but converging perspectives: (more…)
CFP: Trust, Argumentation and Technology
Posted in Argumentation, CFP, Computation, Connections, tagged argument and computation, argumentation and technology, Fabio Paglieri, trust and technology on October 31, 2013| Leave a Comment »
Call for papers
TRUST, ARGUMENTATION AND TECHNOLOGY
Special issue of Argument & Computation
Guest edited by Fabio Paglieri (ISTC-CNR Roma)
Deadline for submission: 15 December 2013
RATIONALE
Trust and argumentation have both been explored extensively, for their own sake as well as in the context of their relevance for technological transformations. More recently, these topics have started to be studied together, with an eye to their numerous and deep interactions. Trust and argumentation converge independently from technology (e.g., trust in speakers often affect our assessment of their arguments), but recent ICT developments have greatly magnified their interplay. (more…)
CFP: Virtues and Arguments
Posted in Argumentation, CFP, Communication, tagged Andrew Aberdein, argument and cognitive science, biases and heuristics, Dan Cohen, Topoi special issues, virtues and arguments on October 18, 2013| 1 Comment »
CALL FOR PAPERS
Topoi: An International Review of Philosophy
VIRTUES AND ARGUMENTS
Deadline for submission: September 1, 2014
GUEST EDITORS
Andrew Aberdein (Florida Institute of Technology)
Daniel Cohen (Colby College)
OVERVIEW
Virtue-based approaches have made substantial contributions to ethics and epistemology. They have also found application in more unexpected fields, including the study of argument. Virtue Argumentation Theory mandates a shift in focus from acts and objects, or processes and products, to agents. Thus, Virtue Argumentation Theory brings a set of difficult but important new questions into focus, particularly about arguers’ conduct in inter-agent transactions. At the same time, Virtue Argumentation Theory also provides new signposts leading to their resolution. Several authors have recently begun to suggest answers to these questions. This special issue will consolidate and extend their work.
POSSIBLE TOPICS (more…)
CFP: Wake Forest University Argumentation Conference
Posted in Argumentation, CFP, Connections, Pragma-dialectics, Rhetoric, tagged argumentation conferences, Wake Forest University on September 20, 2013| Leave a Comment »
April 11-13, 2014
Wake Forest University
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
The 15th Biennial Wake Forest University Argumentation Conference will feature keynote addresses by Hans Hansen, Ekaterina Haskins, and Catherine Palczewski, as well as a special workshop with Frans van Eemeren and a workshop for undergraduate students with Gordon Mitchell.
The Biennial Wake Forest Argumentation Conference began in November, 1983, with a one-day conference on the Wake Forest University campus. After again meeting on the Wake Forest campus in 1985, the Conference was convened in 1987 in the Wake Forest study abroad facility, Casa Artom, in Venice, Italy, with co-sponsorship from the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). The conference has subsequently alternated between “the Venice Conference” and domestic sites.
The 15th Wake Forest University Argumentation Conference will take place concurrent with the 2014 Wake Debate Reunion in Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
We invite papers, panel and seminar submissions: (more…)
