Here’s an interesting bit of controversy over at Leiter’s blog. Let us leave aside for the moment that the comment spurring it largely constitutes a (pervasive) misunderstanding of what experimental philosophy is and claims to do. (A better picture of experimental philosophy can be obtained here.)What I find interesting about it is that one thing that seems to be needed in the conversation that follows in the comment thread is a decent analysis of what it means to appeal to expert authority.
Now where, oh where, would they ever find the kind of analysis they need, I wonder?
Heh. 😉
Leave a Reply