Do PIPA and SOPA threaten to reverse legal burden of proof in the US? Clay Shirky argues they do. I don’t know enough about the legal system, or the proposed legislation. However, this is a serious allegation with implications far beyond the US.
Burden of proof and intellectual property
January 19, 2012 by Cate Hundleby
One Response
Leave a reply to Niya Cancel reply
Search
-
Join 149 other subscribers
Translate
Archives
Categories
- About RAIL (7)
- Announcements (57)
- Argumentation (123)
- CFP (191)
- cognitive science (3)
- Communication (29)
- Computation (55)
- Connections (158)
- Contests (1)
- Contests & Competitions (4)
- Critical Thinking (43)
- dark arts (1)
- Debate (3)
- Discourse Analysis (19)
- Discussion (86)
- Fallacies (20)
- Feedback & Suggestions (1)
- Graduate Studies (3)
- Grant Opportunities (1)
- Grants (1)
- Guest Posts (1)
- Humor (3)
- In memoriam (1)
- Informal Logic (48)
- Job Openings (20)
- Linguistics (15)
- Logic (29)
- News (22)
- Pragma-dialectics (16)
- Rationality (32)
- Research Projects (6)
- Rhetoric (62)
- Seminar (2)
- Seminar/Workshop/Program Announcements (22)
- Studentships (1)
- Summer School (8)
- Symposium (4)
- Teaching (30)
- Uncategorized (8)
- Workshops (12)
Meta
RAIL 
In certain cases it will be burden of proof in the US. But, both PIPA and SOPA are designed to tackle online piracy, with particular emphasis on illegal copies of films and other forms of media hosted on foreign servers.