Happened across this lovely conversation on Philosophy TV this morning. (Oh the things one finds in one’s Twitter feed of a Sunday morning…) Nice to hear a logician of Priest’s caliber and notoriety (some would say infamy) in the mainstream philosophical world saying some of the same thing many argumentation theorists have said about formal logic and it’s presentation in the classroom. Of course Priest winds up in a different place than informal logic, rhetoric, or pragma-dialectics but that doesn’t diminish the interest here. Fair warning: this discussion is about an hour long. It is, however, really interesting and surprisingly wide ranging. Enjoy!
Posts Tagged ‘Graham Priest’
Search
-
Join 361 other subscribers
Translate
Archives
Categories
- About RAIL (7)
- Announcements (57)
- Argumentation (123)
- CFP (191)
- cognitive science (3)
- Communication (29)
- Computation (55)
- Connections (158)
- Contests (1)
- Contests & Competitions (4)
- Critical Thinking (43)
- dark arts (1)
- Debate (3)
- Discourse Analysis (19)
- Discussion (86)
- Fallacies (20)
- Feedback & Suggestions (1)
- Graduate Studies (3)
- Grant Opportunities (1)
- Grants (1)
- Guest Posts (1)
- Humor (3)
- In memoriam (1)
- Informal Logic (48)
- Job Openings (20)
- Linguistics (15)
- Logic (29)
- News (22)
- Pragma-dialectics (16)
- Rationality (32)
- Research Projects (6)
- Rhetoric (62)
- Seminar (2)
- Seminar/Workshop/Program Announcements (22)
- Studentships (1)
- Summer School (8)
- Symposium (4)
- Teaching (30)
- Uncategorized (8)
- Workshops (12)
Meta
RAIL 