Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument Vienna, Austria, September 10-12, 2012 CALL FOR INNOVATIVE APPLICATIONS CALL FOR DEMONSTRATIONS 4th International Conference on COMPUTATIONAL MODELS OF ARGUMENT (COMMA 2012) www.kr.tuwien.ac.at/comma2012/ AIMS AND SCOPE Argumentation is an exciting research topic in artificial intelligence, with a broad spectrum of research activities ranging from theory to applications. [...]
Posts Tagged ‘artificial intelligence’
CFP: COMMA 2012
Posted in CFP, Computation, tagged argumentation and computing, artificial intelligence, COMMA 2012, computational argumentation, Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Argument on February 22, 2012 | Leave a Comment »
Workshop: Formal Methods in Argument Reconstruction
Posted in Computation, Connections, Rationality, Workshops, tagged Argumentation, artificial intelligence, Bayesian reasoning, formal methods in argumentation, GAP 8, legal argumentation, natural language arguments on January 24, 2012 | Leave a Comment »
The purpose of this international workshop is to bring together researchers who apply formal methods, widely understood, to natural language argumentation in order to provide a reconstruction which can provide the basis for an evaluation. A related objective is to make the state of the art accessible to audiences who predominantly reconstruct natural language argumentation with more [...]
Open Positions in Formal Argumentation Research
Posted in Computation, Job Openings, tagged Argumentation jobs, artificial intelligence, Bayesian Networks, Designing and Understanding Forensic Bayesian Networks with Arguments and Scenarios, forensic science research jobs, University of Groningen, University of Utrecht on December 8, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
PhD positions Forensic Science (2,0 fte) Job description These two PhD positions are part of the project “Designing and Understanding Forensic Bayesian Networks with Arguments and Scenarios” that is funded by the Netherlands Institute for Scientific Research in the Forensic Science program (www.nwo.nl/forensicscience). The project is a cooperation of the University of Groningen (Department of [...]
Informal Logic vol. 31 no.2
Posted in Announcements, Discussion, Informal Logic, Pragma-dialectics, Rhetoric, tagged argument diagramming, argument schemes, Argumentation, artificial intelligence, Cathal Woods, diagramming objections, Geoff Goddu, Informal Logic, intellectual empathy, Maureen Linker, process-product distinction, responding to prejudice, Tangming Yuan, Tim Kelly on July 15, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
Volume 31, number 2 of Informal Logic is now available for your reading pleasure. Particularly recommended in this issue is Geoff Goddu’s 2010 AILACT Essay Prize-winning article on the process/product ambiguity. I had the good fortune to see this work in an earlier phase at ISSA last summer and I’m very happy to see it [...]
-
RAIL on Twitter
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
Archives
Categories
- About RAIL (3)
- Announcements (33)
- Argumentation (24)
- CFP (85)
- Computation (16)
- Connections (64)
- Contests & Competitions (2)
- Critical Thinking (21)
- Discourse Analysis (5)
- Discussion (61)
- Fallacies (9)
- Guest Posts (1)
- Humor (3)
- Informal Logic (22)
- Job Openings (2)
- Logic (4)
- News (17)
- Pragma-dialectics (7)
- Rationality (17)
- Rhetoric (21)
- Seminar (2)
- Seminar/Workshop/Program Announcements (19)
- Summer School (1)
- Teaching (23)
- Uncategorized (3)
- Workshops (2)
Meta
