=============================================================================== CALL FOR PAPERS NMR 2012 14th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2012) http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/NMR12/ Co-located with KR 2012, DL 2012, KiBP 2012, CILC 2012, AI*IA 2012 Rome, Italy June 8-10, 2012 =============================================================================== AIMS AND SCOPE The NMR workshop series is the premier specialized forum for researchers in non-monotonic reasoning and related areas. This will [...]
Posts Tagged ‘Argumentation’
CFP: 14th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR 2012)
Posted in CFP, Connections, Computation, Argumentation, Logic, tagged Argumentation, belief revision, NMR 2012, non-classical logic, non-monotonic logic, non-monotonic reasoning, uncertainty on February 21, 2012 | Leave a Comment »
CFP: OSSA 2013: Virtues of Argumentation
Posted in CFP, tagged Argumentation, C. Thomas Goodnight, calls for papers, Dan Cohen, Informal Logic, Marianne Doury, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation, OSSA 2013, Rhetoric on February 21, 2012 | Leave a Comment »
Call for Proposals Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) VIRTUES of ARGUMENTATION May 22-25, 2013 University of Windsor Keynote speakers: Daniel H. Cohen, Department of Philosophy, Colby College Marianne Doury, Communication & Politics, CNRS – Paris G. Thomas Goodnight, Annenberg School of Communication, University of Southern California The OSSA Organizing Committee invites proposals [...]
GTR 2012: First International Workshop on Argumentation & Rhetoric in Public Discourse, Language, & Law
Posted in Seminar, tagged Adelino Cattani, Argumentation, Bice Mortara Garavelli, CERMEG, Christian Plantain, Frans van Eemeren, GTR 2012, legal argumentation, legal methodology, legal studies, linguistics, public discourse, Rhetoric on February 7, 2012 | Leave a Comment »
The organizers wish to announce the 12th Annual Conference on Rhetoric «Giornate Tridentine di Retorica 12 – GTR 2012», as the First International Workshop on «Argumentation & Rhetoric (in Public Discourse, in Language, in Law)». The Workshop, sponsored by CERMEG (Research Centre on Legal Methodology), will be held 7-8 June 2012 at the University of [...]
CFP: Third International Conference in Logic, Argumentation, and Critical Thinking
Posted in CFP, tagged Argumentation, argumentation conferences, CEAR, Christopher Tindale, critical thinking, critical thinking conferences, Diego Portales University, Elvira Narvaja de Arnaux, Johan van Bentham, logic, logic conferences on February 7, 2012 | Leave a Comment »
Dates: January 8-11, 2013 at Diego Portales University, Santiago, Chile The Third International Conference of Logic, Argumentation and Critical Thinking is a new academic effort of our Centre to continue what began in January 2008 and continued in October 2010, the first and second Conferences respectively. Just as with the first two Conferences, which brought [...]
Workshop: Formal Methods in Argument Reconstruction
Posted in Computation, Connections, Rationality, Workshops, tagged Argumentation, artificial intelligence, Bayesian reasoning, formal methods in argumentation, GAP 8, legal argumentation, natural language arguments on January 24, 2012 | Leave a Comment »
The purpose of this international workshop is to bring together researchers who apply formal methods, widely understood, to natural language argumentation in order to provide a reconstruction which can provide the basis for an evaluation. A related objective is to make the state of the art accessible to audiences who predominantly reconstruct natural language argumentation with more [...]
Third Workshop on Complex Networks
Posted in CFP, Computation, tagged Argumentation, complex networks, complexity, Computation, third workshop on complex networks on November 8, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
3rd Workshop on Complex Networks Call for Papers/Abstracts This international workshop on complex networks (CompleNet 2012) aims at bringing together researchers and practitioners working on areas related to complex networks. In the past two decades we have been witnessing an exponential increase on the number of publications in this field. From biological systems to computer [...]
CFP: Trends in Logic XI, 2012
Posted in CFP, tagged applied logic, Argumentation, belief revision, epistemology, formal epistemology, logic, logic conferences, non-monotonic logic, paraconsistent logic, paradoxes, semantics, truth on September 23, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
CALL FOR PAPERS: Trends in Logic XI, 2012 (Ruhr University Bochum) The 11th Trends in Logic international conference will be held at Ruhr University Bochum, Germany, from June 3-June 5, 2012 under the title “Advances in Philosophical Logic”. It is organized by the chair of Logic and Epistemology at the Department of Philosophy II of [...]
CFP: Psychology, Emotion, and the Human Sciences
Posted in CFP, tagged Informal Logic, philosophy, Argumentation, CRRAR, emotion, University of Windsor, psychology, Jon Elster, history of psychology, contemporary psychology and sociology, literary studies, the history of emotion, the scholarship of teaching and learning, affective education on August 17, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
Psychology, Emotion, and the Human Sciences A Symposium at the University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario Canada 20th to 21st of April, 2012. Deadline for Submissions: 1 November 2011 In Alchemies of the Mind: Rationality and the Emotions [Cambridge, 1999], Jon Elster argues that “with an important subset of the emotions [for example, regret, relief, envy, [...]
Informal Logic vol. 31 no.2
Posted in Announcements, Discussion, Informal Logic, Pragma-dialectics, Rhetoric, tagged argument diagramming, argument schemes, Argumentation, artificial intelligence, Cathal Woods, diagramming objections, Geoff Goddu, Informal Logic, intellectual empathy, Maureen Linker, process-product distinction, responding to prejudice, Tangming Yuan, Tim Kelly on July 15, 2011 | Leave a Comment »
Volume 31, number 2 of Informal Logic is now available for your reading pleasure. Particularly recommended in this issue is Geoff Goddu’s 2010 AILACT Essay Prize-winning article on the process/product ambiguity. I had the good fortune to see this work in an earlier phase at ISSA last summer and I’m very happy to see it [...]
How Comments are Killing the Commons
Posted in Connections, Discussion, tagged Argumentation, communication, democracy, democratic deliberation, internet communications, internet culture, Letters of Note, online conversation, online exchanges, responsible communication, Shaun Usher, trust on June 20, 2011 | 4 Comments »
Last week Shaun Usher, custodian of the excellent website “Letters of Note” announced that he would close the comments section on all posts. He writes: All complaints should be directed towards a section of society to whom the concept of even vaguely civil discussion means nothing. …I simply cannot afford to continue mopping up after [...]