Applications are invited for two positions in Dundee: a postdoctoral research assistant for the TSB- & EPSRC-funded project “Argument Analytics” (starting from Nov 2014); and for a PhD student for the EPSRC DTG-funded project “Recognizing Trust in Natural Language” (starting from Dec 2014). (more…)
Archive for the ‘Announcements’ Category
It’s true, not much has happened here this summer. What gives?
Well, we had a little trouble. We had some illnesses, shifting burdens at work that included some heavy, important, and unforeseen tasks, and to top it all off, a flood that put most of the the RAIL home office out on the curb for the trash man. It was an eventful couple of months.
Things are looking up though. I’ve a place I can work set up again, and I’ll be clearing the backlog of announcements and ArgEvents calendar updates over the next couple of days and, with any luck, we’ll be back up and running as usual thereafter. In the meantime, please accept my apologies for late and delayed postings!
Workshop on Argument Mining: Perspectives from Information Extraction, Information Retrieval and Computational Linguistics
9-10 July 2014, Dundee, Scotland
SECOND CALL FOR PAPERS AND PARTICIPATION
Submissions of position statement are invited for the SICSA Workshop on Argument Mining to be held in Dundee, Scotland.
Argument mining exploits the techniques and methods of natural language processing, or more specifically – text and opinion mining, for semi-automatic and automatic recognition and extraction of structured argument data from unstructured natural language texts. Lying at the intersection of sentiment analysis and computational models of argument, it is attracting increasing attention with an ACL workshop on the topic in Baltimore (http://www.uncg.edu/cmp/ArgMining2014/) and a meeting dedicated to the topic in Warsaw (http://argdiap.pl/argdiap2014).
FIRST CALL FOR PARTICIPATION
Summer School on Argumentation: Computational and Linguistic Perspectives
Thu Sept 4th – Mon Sept 8th 2014, Dundee, Scotland http://ssa2014.arg.dundee.ac.uk/
The Summer School aims to provide attendees with a solid foundation in computational and linguistic aspects of argumentation and the emerging connections between the two. Furthermore, attendees will gain experience in using various tools for argument analysis and processing.
The School is being held in the days before the COMMA 2014 conference in Pitlochry (http://comma2014.arg.dundee.ac.uk) and will include tutorials from the conference’s invited speakers, as well as other leading academics in computational approaches to argumentation and linguistics.
Vol 34, No 2 (2014)
Table of Contents
Rhetoric, Dialectic and Logic: The Wild-Goose Chase for an Essential Distinction (152-166), Charlotte Jørgensen
The Authority of Citations and Quotations in Academic Papers (167-191), Begoña Carrascal
Throwing the Baby Out with the Water: From Reasonably Scrutinizing Authorities to Rampant Scepticism About Expertise (192-218), Markus Seidel
Meta-argumentation, An Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory (219-239), J. Anthony Blair
All articles available online, open access: Informal Logic: Reasoning and Argumentation in Theory and Practice
Aristotle on Bad Arguments
Leading Minds Research Project.
4-5th July, 2014
Why does Aristotle include knowledge of defective arguments within the arts of dialectic and rhetoric? On one attractive way of understanding the nature of Aristotelian rhetoric and dialectic, these are (in large measure) expertises in the use of good arguments and good reasoning to persuade others. How then should we explain the place Aristotle gives to defective arguments (merely apparent enthymemes / syllogisms / refutations, sophisms, and in general invalid and otherwise defective arguments) within his works on these expertises of dialectic and rhetoric (Topics, Sophistical Refutations and Rhetoric)? How should we understand his apparent recommendations regarding the use of such arguments? By what standards of propriety does he mark out arguments as “merely apparent syllogisms/enthymemes”, particularly given his famously “more relaxed” standards for genuine enthymemes in rhetoric?