In the wake of the recent OSSA conference (which was great–thanks again to all the folks in Windsor who made it happen!) I’ve made a couple of updates here at RAIL. (more…)
Archive for the ‘About RAIL’ Category
Steve and I have had an extended discussion about the subversive potential of art since the (latest) Hendricks scandal broke. The case of the public library in Troy, Michigan is a good case in point, I think, of how hiding the artistic quality of a communication can aid in critical thinking, foster political dialogue, and be constitutive to the art itself.
When the library was in danger of closing, supporters enacted a reductio ad absurdum on those pushing for the closure to save on taxes. The supporters posted false publicity of a book burning party, a campaign that enraged so many people that the nature of the discourse shifted away from taxes and back to books; eventually the library was saved.
Just a quick update to let everyone know that I’ve done some things to make RAIL easier to follow on different platforms. I’ve set up a long-overdue Twitter account: @RAILBlog and I’ve created a Google Plus page you can follow as well. The G+ page can be found under “RAIL Blog“–creative, yes? Once I figure out how to do it I’ll get all these things all synced up for you all, but for the time being at least they now exist. :-)
Welcome to RAIL!
This is a blog for scholars engaged in the study of reasoning, argumentation theory, informal logic, rhetoric, and critical thinking. It is intended to be as inclusive and interdisciplinary as is the field of argumentation theory itself.
I chose the name ‘RAIL’ not only for its convenience as an acronym, but because I like the sense of motion and direction it conveys. I am optimistic about the future of argumentation theory: I think it is going somewhere as a field of study, and that it has a lot of promise. There’s also something suggestive of travel in the name ‘RAIL’ which I like, as it rings true to the international and interdisciplinary nature of the study of argumentation. Argumentation theorists do a lot of traveling across physical borders to attend each other’s conferences and workshops, and we do a lot of border crossing of a different kind as we collaborate across academic disciplines in the work that we do. I’m hoping RAIL will be at least some small contribution to that work.